|
What is the tax treatment of a like-kind exchange that involves
more than two parties? If the transactions involved are carefully
structured to meet the like-kind exchange requirements, you
should be able to defer all or part of the tax on your gain
on the exchanged property.
The typical multi-party exchange arises when one party (lets
call her Alice) who owns Whiteacre, seeks to exchange it for
Blackacre, owned by Carol. Carol, however, wants to sell Blackacre
rather than exchange it for other realty. A third party, Bob,
wants to buy Whiteacre, but if Alice simply sells it to him,
shell have to recognize her gain on the sale. The transaction
can be arranged as follows:
Bob buys Blackacre from Carol. Bob then exchanges it with
Alice for Whiteacre. Alice should not have to recognize any
gain on the sale under the like-kind exchange rules. If Whiteacre
is worth more than Blackacre, Bob will have to pay extra consideration
in the exchange. If the extra consideration is cash (or other
non-like- kind property), Alice will have to recognize her
gain up to the amount of extra consideration received. Please
let me know if you would like more information on how the
like-kind exchange rules work in general.
|
Alternatively, Alice could have first directly exchanged
Whiteacre for Blackacre with Carol. Carol could then sell
Whiteacre to Bob. Again, Alice would be able to avoid tax
on her gain on Whiteacre under the like-kind exchange rules.
The important conclusion to draw from the above example is
that you may be able to accomplish a like-kind exchange without
having to find an owner of property willing to trade with
you directly. If you can more simply find (1) a buyer for
your property and (2) property for sale that you seek to acquire,
you should be able to structure a like- kind exchange as the
parties in the above examples did.
|